2013/5/11 Federico Bruni <fedel...@gmail.com>: > > 2013/5/11 Janek Warchoł <janek.lilyp...@gmail.com> >> >> I'm 100% for automated typesetting: it's my dream and the very reason >> why i'm using LilyPond. >> However, my experience (particularly with Fried project) shows that >> with regard to slurs and ties, LilyPond is very far from automated >> typesetting. If you want publication quality, you _have_ to tweak the >> output quite heavily - would you rather do this via setting >> control-points directly? Actually, \shape is quite close to the >> spirit of automated engraving, because if the layout changes slightly, >> \shape modifications usually "adapt" and still produce good results. >> Even with \shape, correcting ties and slurs is still the most >> time-consuming task in preparing the Fried material for publication. >> Quite frankly, if we didn't have \shape, i'd say that LilyPond was >> incapable of handling Fried project :( > > > I think I missed this project, all I can find is this: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-04/msg00177.html > > Would you present it in the next LilyPond report? (does anybody still work > on it?)
Sure, we're working on it with Urs (progressing slowly). It'd be nice for LilyPond Report, but frankly i think we should rather create a multi-author blog - it would be easier to keep it active. janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
