Alberto Simões <al...@alfarrabio.di.uminho.pt> writes: > On 10/05/13 14:42, David Nalesnik wrote: >> >> On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Alberto Simões >> <al...@alfarrabio.di.uminho.pt <mailto:al...@alfarrabio.di.uminho.pt>> >> wrote: >> >> >> Probably the fact that I am running 2.16. Updating. >> >> >> \shape will in fact work with 2.16. You just need to use a different >> ordering of the arguments: >> >> \shape Slur #'((0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0)) >> >> (The reason the order of the arguments was changed in later versions is >> to allow the command to work as a tweak, too.) > > Updated, thanks :)
Well, 2.17 is slowly shaping up towards the next stable release, even though the amount of recently discovered regressions and finetuning is not really encouraging. On the other hand, you should probably not miss the opportunity to find and report your own regressions: they won't disappear unless someone trips over them and hollers. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
