I could be wrong, but I would think that the primary motivation for
specifying the same time signature a second time is to have it displayed a
second time? The only time I can think of it not being intended this way is
that if someone has serial voices/parts/whatever on the same staff and the
time signature is explicitly declared in both.

Cheers,
Carl


On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Michael Rivers <michaeljriv...@gmail.com>wrote:

> I make lots of worksheets in which I need a time signature repeated for the
> student's answer. I like the current behavior.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/repeated-time-signatures-tp145185p145262.html
> Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to