I could be wrong, but I would think that the primary motivation for specifying the same time signature a second time is to have it displayed a second time? The only time I can think of it not being intended this way is that if someone has serial voices/parts/whatever on the same staff and the time signature is explicitly declared in both.
Cheers, Carl On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Michael Rivers <michaeljriv...@gmail.com>wrote: > I make lots of worksheets in which I need a time signature repeated for the > student's answer. I like the current behavior. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/repeated-time-signatures-tp145185p145262.html > Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user >
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
