Am Dienstag, den 23.04.2013, 13:43 +0000 schrieb Klaus Föhl: > Janek Warchoł wrote: > > Many thanks for this report! You made me realize that i didn't > > promote LilyPond actively enough. We have unique features to offer > > and people in the music industry should know about us. > > As the Lilypond name was mentioned a few times in that said meeting, > my impression was that it was known enough to the audience so no need > seen by the speakers to introduce it. > At one point it was explicitly quoted as rendering engine. > > Whether all are aware about "unique features" is another question. > > Be aware, this was musicXML and Michael Good works for "Finale", > so one can understand if he thinks about giving Finale the (future) > role as reference musicXML implementation. > > And musicXML was pitched as "the" exchange format (dunno if this really > is the case) plus Lilypond is not on the list of software featuring > both Import and Export capability, so there is no guarantee to > publishing houses that they can avoid getting locked in another time. Hmmm.
> > Cheers > Klaus > > P.S. in a private discussion Lilypond syntax was characterised to me as > hierarchical (overtone of restraint/limited) with Staff > Voices hence > it is difficult to run a voice across several staffs (i.e. piano). That may well be (e.g. it is difficult to write slurs or tieas across different voices. But OTOH LilyPond doesn't suffer from other limitations, e.g. being bar-centric, 'making it difficult to have different timings in parallel' > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
