Am Dienstag, den 23.04.2013, 10:09 +0200 schrieb David Kastrup: > "Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net> writes: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Urs Liska" <u...@openlilylib.org> > > To: <lilypond-user@gnu.org> > > Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 9:09 PM > > Subject: Finale and Sibelius files > > > >> could somebody be so kind and send me Finale and/or Sibelius files with > >> the equivalent of > >> this LilyPond file: > >> > >> { c' } > > > > I'll send you something similar from Sibelius 7 very soon directly to > > you. However, getting something exactly like that (i.e. a single > > crochet in the score) is somewhat non-trivial in Sibelius, since it is > > very "bar focused", so I'll send a version with a single semi-breve c. > > It also has lots of stuff about the instrument, but again, that's > > Sib's default. > > To be fair: the LilyPond file will get more verbose too if you use one > of the Frescobaldi templates. And not using a template is "expert > usage". I'm taking the liberty to slightly exaggerate in order to emphasize the point here. Can't see anything evil in it ;-)
> > For me, the point of ridiculosity was more or less reached when even > trivial Microsoft Word documents could no longer be expected to fit on > Floppy disk (1.44MB). Imagine a bad sector in that binary dump. Even > if you managed to get this to work somehow, you'd have no idea when and > how and why it would blow up around your ears later. > > "Add the missing pieces based on a printout" is not an option for binary > formats. Good example! Urs > _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user