> As far as what can be controlled by Lilypond and it's developers, > making sure PNG files are generated well *is* something that should > be addressed, since that is completely within Lilypond's control.
Does GhostScript's PNG backend produces satisfying results? Otherwise, what about creating high-resolution images which get sampled down? I'm not a graphics expert, so just guessing. Werner _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
