On 04/03/2013 01:22 AM, David Kastrup wrote: > Yes, it is. The terms of use of a proprietary program generally presume > a binding contract _restricting_ the scope of rights normally granted > with the legitimate purchase of media. > > The difference is that the proprietary vendor needs to establish that > such a contract has been entered, and he has the burden of proof that > his contract conditions have been violated. > > With a license (such asthe GPL), the burden of proof that he had license > to do as he did lies with the user of software. > > That's quite a different playing ground.
Sure, but whichever playground you're in, there can be conditions whose violation removes your right to play. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
