On 04/02/2013 08:53 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > LilyPond is a GNU program and so follows the licensing policies of the > GNU project.
Sure, but I don't see that this prevents you from making a permissive licensing choice for parts of your program where this is appropriate -- I imagine the GNU project would appreciate the importance of code copyleft not accidentally overreaching to users' compositions. If you're restricted to GNU licenses, the GNU All-Permissive license might be an appropriate choice. Anyway, I would really appreciate your input on whether (and what) to write to the Software Freedom Law Center. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
