Hi,

Musicxml2ly is a nice tool, even if the output is quite often not perfect and needs manual editing to - often easily - fix errors. (I have plans to test a large collection of xml scores, and make a list of all strange and/or bad results I'm encountering. But that's not what this message is about)

Fixing errors in complex lilypond files is easier when the file is nicely formatted. But IMO the output from music2xml, even if syntactically correct, often looks ugly. When I use frescobaldi's formatting tool things already look much better.

Is muscxml2ly's ugly output formatting a matter of personal taste and style, or is this an issue worth to be added to the buglist?

--

MT

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to