"Trevor Daniels" <t.dani...@treda.co.uk> writes: > Paul Scott wrote Wednesday, March 20, 2013 7:56 AM > > >>I get segmentation faults with 2.17.14 on a medium to large set of files >> which compile fine with 2.17.13. I have gotten these errors with >> some other >> recent 2.17.xx versions. I don't believe I will get errors with a >> minimal >> example. >> >> What evidence can I provide that might help find the problem? > > Well, start removing things from your code until the error goes away. > Start with large sections. Put back what you have just removed and > continue removing other things or smaller pieces. When there is nothing > left that can be removed without also removing the error you have a > minimal example. > > The chances are in carrying out this process that you will discover > what is causing the problem. Tell us what it is.
That's more or less cut&paste from the instructions for a minimal example. There is no guarantee that the code removed along with the segfault is responsible for the segfault. But there is a good chance that you have arrived at a version where the segfault is easier to diagnose, because we'll be searching for the needle in a quite smaller haystack. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
