Marc Hohl <m...@hohlart.de> writes: > Am 07.03.2013 18:45, schrieb David Kastrup: >> Marc Hohl <m...@hohlart.de> writes: >> >>> Am 07.03.2013 18:36, schrieb David Kastrup: >>>> Noeck <noeck.marb...@gmx.de> writes: >>>> >>>>>> We use "|." for the end bar not because of its _visual_ properties, >>>>> If that is the case, I would say \bar "." is more logical. >>>> Zounds. Tell you what: I'd consider that an actual improvement. >>> No – I still would prefer if LilyPond draws the final bar line without >>> having >>> to explicitely tell her. >> Take a look at >> <URL:http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/writing-pitches> >> >> I really would not like to have to tell LilyPond for every single >> fragment to not use a final bar line. > Ok, I get the point, but still – what's wrong with an appropriate > override, say > > fragment = \override Score.finarBarType = "|" > > and then > > \fragment > \relative c'' { > c2 fis > c2 ges > b2 eisis > b2 feses > } > > ?
And clutter up the manual with all the printed mysterious instances of \fragment? > I really would not like to have to tell LilyPond for every piece I > write to end it with a final bar line ;-) A piece has one final bar line. A music theory text has thousands of fragments without final bar line. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
