On 02/17/2013 04:48 PM, Luca Rossetto Casel wrote:
In present editions, this notation is generally uniformed to the modern one - eventually putting the added alterations in parentheses or brackets.
Is this really a case where brackets would be used? The typical reason for inserting a bracketed accidental would be a case where the accidental is missing in all sources, but musical context makes it almost certain that the accidental should be there.
The situation described here is slightly different as it isn't so much a _missing_ accidental in the real sense, as a different stylistic convention for placement of accidentals. It seems like the sort of circumstance where most editors and editions, including Urtext, would feel comfortable placing the accidentals without comment or brackets.
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
