Am 17.02.2013 04:09, schrieb David Kastrup: > Remove the Fingering_engraver, _and_ add a dummy engraver listening to > fingering events and ignoring them. Then New_fingering_engraver will > not feel compelled taking over. >
Ok, there seems to be a reason for this behaviour and a way to deal with it. But it is not what you would call straightforward. Perhaps this interplay could be reflected by the engraver name? Btw, the docs state: "This engraver is ill-named" which also leads to the question what a correct name would be. (I understand that it is difficult to come up with a name, that covers the whole purpose of this engraver) Joram _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
