Hi Bart, > - c:9 produces a C9, including the seventh, (sorry Robert Schmaus, I just > tested it)
Oh ... I think there have been some changes from the previous stable version (2.14) then. I had the problem that I could *not* produce 11 or 9 chords - I always got the "add9" or "add11" version, until somebody informed me that I need to specify the full chord, including the 7. Now (in version 2.16 and 2.17), we have * c : 9 produces <c e g bf d'> and the chord name is C9 * c : 7.9 produces the same * c : 9^7 produces <c e g d'> (but the chord name still is C9 - you can check this on http://lilybin.com/jtiz8e/1 ) I liked the old way better. Sure, it's cumbersome to write c : 7.9.11.13 for a 13 chord, but at least there was full control over the chord. At the very least, c : 9^7 should not be called C9. And, again, it used to be that way in previous versions. Best, Robert _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
