I think it boils down to:
- can a GNU project link to (or promote in any other way) non-free
documentation?
- can I license a tutorial as free if it contains copyrighted material
(considered I got explicit permission to display the example on my web site for
the tutorial).
Somewhat theoretical, I think. But probably necessary anyway.
SoundsFromSound <soundsfromso...@gmail.com> schrieb:
>I must have missed something in this long thread, because all this
>law/lawyer/copyright talk is distracting. I'm assuming it is
>concerning the
>4-measure example on that website or something? Am I close?
>
>Can someone summarize the complaint/situation please? Thank you!
>
>Ben
>
>
>
>-----
>composer | sound designer
>--
>View this message in context:
>http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Guide-to-Writing-Orchestral-Scores-with-Lilypond-tp139065p139327.html
>Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>_______________________________________________
>lilypond-user mailing list
>lilypond-user@gnu.org
>https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
