Hello, 2013/1/4 Colin Hall <colingh...@gmail.com>
> Oscar has run into a known issue with the limited precision of > Rational in Lilypond. > > Although David is correct that this issue can crop up in many places > it makes sense to follow Trevor's suggestion and warn future users who > may end up with the same issue encountered by Oscar. > > Also, we need a tracker to have the C++ rational replaced with a > Scheme implementation with unlimited precision. I had a look on the > tracker: > > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?can=2&q=rational > > There does not seem to be an existing issue tracker for this. > > So, I suggest a tracker for the documentation enhancement, and another > to capture the idea of replacing the existing C++ rational > implementation with an arbitrary precision implementation. That second > tracker may trigger a debate about performance but I'd prefer that > took place on the tracker rather than here on the bug list. > Here are the issues: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3084 http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3085 Marek bug squad member
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
