EmilLask <laske...@gmail.com> writes:
> Yes it is the measure 2.
>
> r8 fa,8~ q2.
> The score contains a rest of halfbeat, a chord of halfbeat tied with
> another chord of 2 beats pointed.
>
> In the midifile there is a rest and two chords (the same chord)
> without tie.
Well, the event display of rosegarden does not agree with you, but
lilymidi --pretty does:
Track 2:
Time 0:
Note on: Channel 0, G3(55)
Note on: Channel 0, Ais3(58)
Note on: Channel 0, D4(62)
Time 1344:
Note off: Channel 0, G3(55)
Note off: Channel 0, Ais3(58)
Note off: Channel 0, D4(62)
Note on: Channel 0, G3(55)
Note on: Channel 0, Ais3(58)
Note on: Channel 0, D4(62)
Time 1536:
Note off: Channel 0, G3(55)
Note off: Channel 0, Ais3(58)
Note off: Channel 0, D4(62)
Time 1728:
Note on: Channel 0, F3(53)
Note on: Channel 0, A3(57)
Note on: Channel 0, C4(60)
Time 1920:
Note off: Channel 0, F3(53)
Note off: Channel 0, A3(57)
Note off: Channel 0, C4(60)
Note on: Channel 0, F3(53)
Note on: Channel 0, A3(57)
Note on: Channel 0, C4(60)
Time 3072:
Note off: Channel 0, F3(53)
Note off: Channel 0, A3(57)
Note off: Channel 0, C4(60)
Note on: Channel 0, Ais3(58)
Note on: Channel 0, G3(55)
Note on: Channel 0, Dis3(51)
Time 3840:
Note off: Channel 0, Ais3(58)
Note off: Channel 0, G3(55)
Note off: Channel 0, Dis3(51)
Note on: Channel 0, Dis3(51)
Note on: Channel 0, G3(55)
Note on: Channel 0, Ais3(58)
The question is whether this was recently introduced. The last Midi
changes of some relevance would seem to have been
commit fe744fb2a3a9bb4e2fa49e8a69b2b9db140c3e35
Author: Heikki Tauriainen <g034...@welho.com>
Date: Wed Aug 1 10:26:53 2012 +0200
Midi: store dynamic information for note-on velocity; issue 1661
commit 1c980a9906a7ea01b9f99487e75580f7232f2491
Author: Heikki Tauriainen <g034...@welho.com>
Date: Mon Jul 30 10:14:55 2012 +0200
Issue 2672/1: Midi fixes
When other MIDI midi events (such as an instrument change) occur
simultaneously with note(s), they should be placed in the MIDI file
before the note-on events, otherwise there is no way to (reliably)
affect the first note in a score.
Those would have appeared in 2.15.42. Can somebody check whether we get
different behaviors between 2.15.42 and 2.15.41?
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
