Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@googlemail.com> writes: > 2012/12/30 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: >> Richard Shann <richard.sh...@virgin.net> writes: >> >>> I too am very interested in adding links to objects, but when I paste >>> your example into lilypond version 2.16.0 I get syntax errors - is it >>> specific to 2.17.9? >> >> Yes. That's one rather prominent extension of 2.17 (the previous syntax >> will still work for the most important commands, but it is rather >> surprising how fast the power users are forgetting its details, strongly >> suggesting that the previous syntax was too complex for infrequent >> users). > > Well, I didn't _forget_ it, but I thought it might be a good idea to > offer the new syntax-possibilities to a wider public.
I was not actually talking about you here. We already had a variety of power users including myself offering examples in "old syntax" on various occasions that were not, actually, quite correct. Considering that I/we have worked for years with this syntax, it is actually embarrassing. > Therefore I indicated my suggestion with \version "2.17.9" > > Perhaps i was wrong. Will use the old syntax in future. I don't have all that good of a migration plan, considering all the hassles we are having with moving to 2.16 already. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
