Thanks Shane,
That helped. Beam.concaveness doesn't affect the vertical spacing between
staves, so the beam is in the right direction but the stems are too short.
I combined it with a different tweak to widen the space between staves and
it worked pretty well.
Mark Witmer
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Shane Brandes <sh...@grayskies.net> wrote:
> Try \override Beam #'concaveness = #x where is some negative value.
> It is in the LSR (lilypond snippet repository)
>
> Shane
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Mark Witmer <m...@markwitmer.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to typeset something like the following example:
> >
> > \version "2.17.10"
> >
> > \new PianoStaff <<
> > \new Staff = "up" \relative c'' {
> > r4
> > \change Staff = "down" \stemUp c16
> > \change Staff = "up" \stemDown <a e> c, a }
> > \new Staff = "down" \relative c'' { r4 s }
> >>>
> >
> > The result is attached. Is there a way to force LilyPond to add enough
> space
> > between staves so that the beam moves up from left to right?
> >
> > I've tried to modify StaffGroup.staff-staff-spacing.stretchability and
> the
> > length of the stems connected to the beam, but the first causes unwanted
> > space between staves elsewhere in my score, and the second simply
> increases
> > the downward slope of the beam.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Mark Witmer
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lilypond-user mailing list
> > lilypond-user@gnu.org
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> >
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
