"m...@mikesolomon.org" <m...@mikesolomon.org> writes: > I agree that moment addition and subtraction is a royal pain. If I > tackled this, which I might, the solution would be more general in the > form of what I call "stream filters."
I'd strongly recommend against that: the only reliable way to establish timing is actual iteration, and that's costly (well, one can abort it once time 0 is over, but it still needs to get set up). Short of that, we'll just move the problem into more obscurity and get new surprises when the pseudo-timekeeping gets things wrong. Now we actually have this sort of "squeeze grace material in before the time starts properly" mechanism already, with grace-fixup chains and stuff. Prepending _another_ such mechanism because the existing mechanism fails to work reliably seems like a step towards making it much harder to actually fix things. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
