Noeck <noeck.marb...@gmx.de> writes:
> Am 03.12.2012 00:29, schrieb David Nalesnik:
>
>>> \acciaccatura { e-\! } d4 \shape PhrasingSlur #'((0 . 1) (0 . 1.8) (0 . 1.8)
>>> (0 . 0))
>>>
>>
>> Nick has given you the new syntax (as of 2.17.4).
>>
>> -David
>
> Why has that been inverted? To me, \shape PhrasingSlur #… is easier to
> read than \shape #… PhrasingSlur. Could someone briefly explain the
> reason for that?
The old syntax was
\shape PhrasingSlur #'((0 . 1) (0 . 1.8) (0 . 1.8) (0 . 0))
cis8 \(
The new one supports either
\shape #'((0 . 1) (0 . 1.8) (0 . 1.8) (0 . 0)) PhrasingSlur
cis8 \(
or
cis8 -\shape #'((0 . 1) (0 . 1.8) (0 . 1.8) (0 . 0)) \(
This saves you from having to remember that \( is a PhrasingSlur, and it
makes it possible to change the shape of a double slur
cis8 ^\( _\)
by shaping each of the constituting slurs independently with its own
call of \shape.
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
