Janek Warchoł <janek.lilyp...@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> sorry for delay, i was very busy...
>
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Wim van Dommelen <m...@wimvd.nl> wrote:
>> But the top part of the example shown uses an include-file.
>> That is not "tiny", anything can happen there. So I would add
>> to the rules for a tiny example no use of include files.
>
> You mean
> \include "english.ly"
> in the page about tiny examples?  Actually, english.ly is a file
> bundled with Lilypond, which allows to spell note names with english
> names ('fsharp' or 'fs' instead of 'fis'), so in this case we know
> what can happen inside.
> But in general i agree that tiny examples shouldn't contain any
> \includes; however, i don't think we should explicitely write all
> rules - the page would become too long.

Well, \language "english" would work for that wouldn't it?

-- 
David Kastrup


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to