On 12 oct. 2012, at 17:27, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> Is there a way to force lilypond to evaluate the repeated music each >> time? > > No. > >> Should I write my own repeat function? > > Won't help as arguments are evaluated before a function is being called. > The best you can do is writing a function that does not receive a music > expression but rather a music function as its argument and then > repeatedly call it. Or just let randomNote take a count as argument. > >> Or is the only way is really to have a scheme function returning a >> list of notes? > > That's easier. > > -- > David Kastrup
Thanks, Ok, I feel that creating the notes using standard lilypond notation then randomize them would be a more flexible approach. 1) creates the notes with a custom property (or may be I could use an existing one, but I did not see a place for such custom use, or I could use \tag but I would prefer not to get in the way of other features) 2) once the music is parsed, call a transform function which will enumerate the events and replace or alter the marked notes. Can I add arbitrary properties to an event? Would this work (I think so)? Is it safe? pertinent? Jean-Alexis _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
