Gilles <gilles.thiba...@free.fr> writes:
> Le Sat, 22 Sep 2012 14:44:19 +0200, Gilles <gilles.thiba...@free.fr> a
> écrit:
>
>>
>>> I am trying to code a piece with voices that use the same
>>> rhythmical fragment over and over again. [..]
>>
>> Perhaps this one :
>> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=654
>
> Oh to bad. When i send my message, i had no answers from anybody to
> the initial message... Sorry
>
> I answer to all messages at one time :
> > I get a whole set of errors
> At the end of the snippet, there is a link "here", to download the
> *last* version of the snippet. Old versions don't work with Lilypond
> 2.16.
> Well, i must admit that i didn't test \changePitch with 2.17
>
> > applyRhythm = #(define-music-function [...]
> The code given by David is an example for all of conciseness, but has
> some limitations
Every code has limitations. The limitations of this example were
matched to the specs.
> 1- Doesn't work with chords
> melody = \relative c { a <d f> g f e b} % error
> 2- All articulations in melody will be ignored
> melody = \relative c { a\p d-> g( f e) b} will gave the same
> result than
> melody = \relative c { a d g f e b}
> 3- You cannot have rests in the patterns
> so you cannot have a pattern like :
> rhythm = { c8 r8 r8. c16 }
Reality check: the given template used _spacer_ rests to specify the
rhythm. If I had copied the given melody into _spacer_ rests, the
output would not have been particularly impressive.
At any rate, a version with specs similar to what you now consider
missing has also been recently discussed and posted on the list IIRC.
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
