"Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net> writes: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Francisco Vila" <paconet....@gmail.com> > To: "Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net> > Cc: "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org>; <lilypond-user@gnu.org> > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 1:56 PM > Subject: Re: Right way of specifying engraver name? > > >> 2012/8/29 Phil Holmes <m...@philholmes.net>: >>>> Ah right. We must improve this documentation bit. Are there more cases >>>> like this? >>> >>> >>> >>> Which bit of the documentation? >> >> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/common-notation-for-keyboards#cross_002dstaff-stems >> >> We say just "using the Span_stem_engraver" but the user can be >> confused when adding/removing other engravers because it is sometimes >> #Name_engraver and sometimes "Name_engraver". > > > I don't believe that would be the right place to change > anything. Everything stated there is correct.
We can probably agree that a way of registering a Scheme engraver in a manner where we don't need to document the difference in using it would beat improving the documentation. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
