On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 08:22:53AM +1000, Nick Payne wrote: > On 19/08/12 16:46, Nick Payne wrote: > >In a chord containing a second, if I place the fingering above the > >notes to avoid having the fingering numerals overlapping each > >other (see > >https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2541), then > >the numerals default to being placed much higher above the > >noteheads than is normal or if either of the notes in the second > >is omitted from the chord: > > > >\version "2.15.43" > > > >\relative c'' { > > \set fingeringOrientations = #'(left) > > \override Fingering #'staff-padding = #'() > > \override Fingering #'add-stem-support = ##f > > <d-0 c-3 f,-0>4 <d^0 c^3 f,-0> <d^0 f,-0> <c^3 f,-0> > >} > > > A similar problem happens with fingerings where the same note is > played simultaneously on two different strings. This happens quite > frequently when transcribing the lute music of Silvius Leopold Weiss > for guitar: > > \version "2.15.43" > > \relative c' { > \set fingeringOrientations = #'(down) > \override Fingering #'staff-padding = #'() > \override Fingering #'add-stem-support = ##f > <d-0 d-4>4 > } >
Thanks for the bug report, Nick. There are several open issue trackers for fingering already but this does seem to be a distinct problem, so I have created a new tracker: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2764 Perhaps you could check the title for accuracy? Cheers, Colin. -- Colin Hall _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
