On 05/20/2012 01:07 AM, Tom Cloyd wrote:
On 05/20/2012 12:56 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 08:53:05AM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Neil
Thornock<neilthorn...@gmail.com> wrote:
Not sure why nothing was mentioned on the website.
I'm not happy with this practice, either.
I eagerly await your patch. If it looks ok I'll tell you to push
directly to staging.
I suggest the following: when a critical bug is found, /modify/ second
paragraph of the "release candidate" news to this:<crossed out>There
are no known Critical issues with this release.</crossed out> A
Critical bug was found, this release candidate is canceled. (date)
Just make a new news item.
- Graham
Does that mean the website gets updated?
t.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tom Cloyd / t...@tomcloyd.com / (435) 272-3332
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
