On 3/11/2012 6:39 PM, John Link wrote:
A few years ago I was encouraged to try LilyPond as an alternative to
Sibelius because LilyPond produced more beautiful scores. I was also
told that it would allow me to do things like specify that bars 25
through 32 are to be identical to bars 9 through 16 and avoid cutting
and pasting from bars 9-16 into 25-32. I liked what I heard, but I was
quite shocked by LilyPond's interface. I would be interested in
hearing from any Sibelius users who have successfully learned
LilyPond. How can I get going in LilyPond as quickly as possible?
In case it's relevant, I should add that I used to program in FORTRAN
and a little bit of UNIX but never in any other languages.
Thanks in advance,
John Link
Hi John,
I can't really speak to LilyPond vs Sibelius use. On the other hand, I
used to be a Finale user and I have had *very* limited contact with
Sibelius. Having said that, while I'm aware of differences between
Sibelius and Finale they share a major feature; namely, an interactive
graphical user interface which displays your music while you work.
LilyPond, as you have likely discerned, does not work that way at all.
I have found that, for me at least, the learning curve for LilyPond is
not terribly steep, but it's long-ish. I know just about nothing about
FORTRAN aside from the fact that it's an old programming language, but I
would imagine that having programming experience would be helpful.
I think the main hurdle is getting used to focusing on the informational
content as you input your scores and worry about output later if you
need to tweak it. The idea is that LilyPond should do the actual
'engraving' for you without much intervention on your part.
Hope this was useful,
-David
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
