Valentin Villenave <valen...@villenave.net> writes: > I have, however, submitted it on LXer which is a more > technically-oriented news feed: > http://lxer.com/module/newswire/view/163334/index.html > > There also have been talks of slashdotting the LilyReport but, then > again, I'm not familiar enough with the /. community to judge.
I've picked Linux Weekly News and Linuxtoday <URL:http://www.linuxtoday.com/developer/2012030500239OSCYSW>, but don't know about Slashdot. >> More broadly, my feeling is that GNU hackers should use the Wikimedia >> projects, wikibooks for the manuals for example... > > There *has* been a Wikibook pertaining to LilyPond (at least in > French); however since most of the documentation works happen within > the LilyPond community, it makes sense to use our own tools and > websites rather than having to move elsewhere where we wouldn't be > entirely in control. LilyPond is rather highly technical: it turns out that most contributions to the manuals not created by active developers need several revisions before they are submittable. It also turns out that there is a _lot_ of material covered in the manuals, and the haphazard coverage of Wikistuff would not really be helpful for a high signal-to-noise ratio. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
