Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@googlemail.com> writes: > 2012/2/11 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: >> Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@googlemail.com> writes: >> >>> Personally I'd prefer sth like the attached. But it might not work >>> with the latest devel-version due to the changes with EventChord. (I >>> can't test it. "2.15.24" is currently my highest version.) >> >> I have not checked this in practice, but theoretically, the only >> affected function would appear to be keepOnlyFirstNote (or so), and >> since this function makes a difference only when there is more than one >> note, namely, when there _is_ an EventChord, I don't think that the >> EventChord changes should cause any difference here. >> >> Of course, if you use chord repetitions (q) here, keepOnlyFirstNote will >> only be able to do its job if you have already run \chordRepeats >> manually (instead of waiting for its automatic run at the start of >> typesetting).
On second thought, it will repeat a chord that has already been reduced to a single note, and so again will do exactly what is needed. > as soon as I made an upgrade I'll test it. If it is important, I could do this myself, but actually I think that we need every active and attentive user we can get to test the current almost-before-stable-release versions on as much of their own code as feasible. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
