On 6-2-2012 12:19, Jan-Peter Voigt wrote:
Hello Joe,
I sometimes use this:
--snip--
#(set! paper-alist (cons '("wide" . (cons (* 15 cm) (* 3 cm)))
paper-alist))
\paper {
#(set-paper-size "wide")
}
\score {
\relative c'' {
bes4 a c b
}
}
--snip--
\paper {
paper-width = 15\cm
paper-height = 3\cm
}
Also does the job AFAIK and seems more intuitive for the common user I
would say.
Any idea whether using paper-width/paper-heigt settings instead of
defining a new paper size has (unwanted) implications on other parts of
the lay-out that can be avoided by using the paper-alist?
regards,
Hans Aikema
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
