2012/2/4 Janek Warchoł <janek.lilyp...@gmail.com>: > > I don't recall discussions about whole note tremolo related to the > tremolo style i was working on.
OK, I was not sure. And at that moment I was not courageous enough to 'dig' into the archive to find the relevant thread. Now I did. And I found this discussion I remembered a bit. It was indeed more recent that the report of 2007, since this discussion occurred in February 2011 (so exactly one year ago). The subject was titled "Cleanup beam scoring code" (yeah, so a bit difficult to find it by searching with the keyword "tremolo"!). Basically Werner, Reinhold and Han-Wen agreed that slanted "beam" tremolo should be the default behaviour for whole notes. And Reinhold said that "According to Gardner Read (p. 236-237) and Kurt Stone (p. 150-151), the beams of whole-note tremolos are slanted like with shorter durations with stems, but the beams are placed centered between the whole notes (i.e. not where an imaginary stem would end!). The only situation where an imaginary stem is used to determine the position/slant of the beams is in cross-staff tremolos." http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011-02/msg00029.html http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011-02/msg00032.html http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2011-02/msg00034.html I'm adding this comment on issue #1176 . > sorry for being grumpy, At least you are not "whining". :D Cheers, Xavier -- Xavier Scheuer <x.sche...@gmail.com> _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
