On 1 January 2012 06:12, Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> wrote: > > Note that the Internals Reference (2.2.65 Mark_engraver) indicates that you > need > to move the Staff_collecting_engraver as well in order to have the mark show > up > in the right place.
If you have a look at the attached .ly file you'll see that he did it. > Mark engraver to the Staff context then manually go through and override it's > visibility on each staff as needed, but this strikes me as extremely tedious, > and if the process can be automated, that would be a great help. Actually I do not see anything wrong in Nick's input. The output is not what is expected with a "correct" input. I would tend to consider it as a bug. Not related to \RemoveEmptyStaves though, but because it seems a StaffGroup cannot handle a "Mark_engraver" (or the bug is in "Staff_collecting_engraver" also). > If the idea above doesn't help, you might try adding the Mark_engraver to > Staff > in a layout block, along with setting RehearsalMark visibility to #'(#f #f #f) > (or #'all-invisible). Then, in the staves for which you want to have > rehearsal > marks, set the visibility to #'(#t #t #f) (i.e. visible at beginning and > middle > of lines, but not at end). That's tricky. The idea to add "Mark_engraver" to the StaffGroup is more logical and should work, IMHO. Cheers, Xavier -- Xavier Scheuer <x.sche...@gmail.com> _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
