Damian leGassick wrote:
>
>
>
> I appreciate the fact that it was designed to save time when entering
> data, but I'm still curious as why even my minimal examples don't work
> properly.
>
> I have a five hundred bar full orchestral score and I need to typeset just
> bars 111-116 (and about a dozen other short extracts) for a musicological
> paper. It would be a real timesaver if skipTypesetting could come to my
> aid - it's close, but it always leaves errors in the first and last bars.
> Simply padding my extract with a bar either side isn't the answer, because
> those bars will then have their own errors.
>
>
the "erratic" behaviour of skipTypeSetting seems to be known (s.
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1543&q=skiptypesetting&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Stars%20Owner%20Patch%20Needs%20Summary
)
there i also found a simple trick to correct the funny timing: insert a
harmless grace note before skipping typesetting!
to not spoil the original score i would suggest to define these skipping
commands in a special voice.
printing only measure 111 - 116 would then look so:
music = { … }
\new Staff <<
\music
\new Voice = "skipping" {
\set Score.skipTypesetting = ##t
s1*110
\grace s8 \set Score.skipTypesetting = ##f
s1*6
\grace s8 \set Score.skipTypesetting = ##t
s1*10
…
}
>>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/skipTypesetting-oddities-tp32988646p32997021.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
