On 8/12/2011, at 10:48 pm, David Kastrup wrote: > Please, *never*, *never*, *never* send a "courtesy copy" of a public > answer as a private mail when answering on a mailing list unless you > have been _explicitly_ asked to provide such a copy. > > Otherwise, you set up _two_ different communication channels that the > person you are showing your "courtesy" then has to answer separately. > It is a great nuisance and additional work and hassle.
Normally I'd agree with you, but in fairness to Paolo I observe that this is the only mailing list I am or ever have been a member of in which the default behaviour is to reply to the sender (only) rather than to the list. I have in consequence more than once unintentionally sent a separate "courtesy copy" message. Best wishes, Matthew _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
