On 12/03/2011 02:05 AM, James wrote:
Hello,
On 3 December 2011 06:55, Paul Scott <waterho...@ultrasw.com
<mailto:waterho...@ultrasw.com>> wrote:
Hi,
2.15.20:
Should the positioning of \tempo over notes be different than over
whole rests?
If so, can I make the second behavior like the first?
\version "2.15.20"
\relative c'' {
\tempo "text over notes" c1 c c c \break
\tempo "text over whole rest(s)" R1*4 c1 c c c c c c
}
Something like
\version "2.14.1"
\relative c'' {
\tempo "text over notes" c1 c c c \break
\textLengthOn
r1^\markup { "text over whole rest(s)" } R1*3 c1 c c c c c c
}
although that doesn't quite give you the 'proper' R1 positioning.
(snip)
I would normally put the \tempo information in a global. One shouldn't
have to write special code for the extracted parts depending on whether
they have full measure rests or notes at the location of the tempo
indication.
How do other people solve this problem?
see some snippets in
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation-big-page#full-measure-rests
That link takes me to the whole document without taking me to the place
you had in mind.
Thanks,
Paul
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
