2011/9/26 Reinhold Kainhofer <reinh...@kainhofer.com>: > Am Montag, 26. September 2011, 18:11:50 schrieb Alberto Simões: >> Hello >> >> At [1] you can find the images of the engraving process of one >> transcription I did. The Lilypond source file is available at [2] and if >> you prefer the PDF version, it is available at [3]. >> >> In this engraving I do not like the amount of space between the two >> systems. I understand that there is not much that Lilypond can do, but >> the overall aspect is kind of... strange. >> >> I am writing to ask for any suggestion to make this output better. > > For my empty score sheet generator, I had to adjust the vertical spacing quite > a bit, too. The default settings of lilypond simply look ugly.
Yes they do. Well, fixing this is on my to-do list. However, fixing it properly will not be easy, because it probably requires rewriting current spacing engine (i know that it sounds ugh). I remember that i've found an example score layout which was impossible to achieve with current system. 2011/9/26 Reinhold Kainhofer <reinh...@kainhofer.com>: > Am Montag, 26. September 2011, 18:25:29 schrieb Janek Warchoł: >> I'd put it differently: there's not much LilyPond *cannot* do. >> For starters, add >> ragged-bottom = ##t >> to your paper block. >> Then, read >> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/flexible-vertical >> -spacing-_005cpaper-variables (notice that the documentation is about >> current stable version - >> 2.14.2. > > Notice, however, that once you set ragged-bottom=##t, then those vertical > spacing settings won't have any effect any more! They will work. Just remember that stretchablility doesn't make much sense when ragged-bottom is turned on, but the others are ok. cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
