2011/9/16 David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com>

>
> Hi, Harm --
>
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 6:18 PM, harm6 <thomasmorle...@googlemail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> I tested your definitions with a longer example using StaffGroup and
>> commented the not used parts with %{ ... %}. (see code below)
>> The log states: ERROR: Wrong type (expecting pair): ()
>>
>> And now the strangest thing: If I uncomment "two" it works!! ("two" is a
>> copy of "one" and not called in the active StaffGroup!!!)
>> If I completely delete "two" out of the file it doesn't work.
>> If I comment eyery line of "two" with % it works!!
>> Some other combinations of commenting in/out parts of the code gives the
>> same result.
>>
>> I've never heard of such a strange behaviour.
>>
>>
> Neither have I ...  Is the file as you send it supposed to create an error?
>
>

Yes!
But compiling this morning: no error. In the evening I copied it again from
the list (to avoid any carelessness), I compiled it without any changes,
and: ERROR: Wrong type (expecting pair): ()

I don't not know what's going here !

Cheers,
  Harm
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to