On Mon 29 Aug 2011, 13:10 David Kastrup wrote: > "Dmytro O. Redchuk" <brownian....@gmail.com> writes: > > > On Sun 28 Aug 2011, 11:21 Janek Warchoł wrote: > >> 2011/8/26 Dmytro O. Redchuk <brownian....@gmail.com>: > >> > On Fri 26 Aug 2011, 13:54 David Kastrup wrote: > >> >> So maybe the "spacer rest" terminology is not doing anybody a favor. > >> >> > >> >> Would you have felt more comfortable if my example had used "\skip" > >> >> instead of "spacer rests"? > >> > No, not sure. Why "music" should contain any "skips" to be "typeset" > >> > nicely? Again -- why? Why "skips" or "spacing rests" to shift hairpin right?
> >> > I wanted to say, that, very probably, "\<{...}" would be really great > >> > (to shift starting point right). And that spacers are, as for me, a bit > >> > "innatural". Well, { c''{offset=XX} } would be nice... probably... too. I don't know. > Spoken differently: for a new person who knows nothing about the syntax, > knowing nothing about the syntax is not a desirable state to remain in. Yes. I agree with you. I just wanted to say that I like \<{...} more than skips and spacers. And I believe it's a matter of taste. Am I wrong? -- very probably. I don't know. -- Dmytro O. Redchuk "Easy to use" is easy to say. Bug Squad -- Jeff Garbers _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user