Damian leGassick <damianlegass...@mac.com> writes: > I'm sorry to contradict David but you'll be hard pushed to find many > published examples of 4. 8 [8 8] that don't have mitigating phrasing > circumstances.
If you take a look at the comments of the bug report, you'll see that you come in second for contradicting me, myself being first. I've added additional musings, basically stating that I should consider 4. [8 8 8] correct in 3/4, but 4~ 8 [8 8 8] wrong, rather preferring to see 4~ 8 8 [8 8]. Which is pretty hard to cast into computer-comprehensible rules... -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
