On Sat 09 Jul 2011, 01:58 Janek Warchoł wrote: > Hi all, > > currently it is: > right: [...] > Dmytro
Actually, I would like the third (right one) to be a bit higher (and deeper, probably). I would definitely like to try it myself... So, for now it's "oh well...", not more. > > therefore i'm opening a Rietveld issue: http://codereview.appspot.com/4664070 > > 2011/7/6 Reinhold Kainhofer <reinh...@kainhofer.com>: > > However, even in the third clef, the curvature of the vertical line looks a > > bit too straight in the lower half... > > I agree that even the third clef could be improved, but i don't think > i'm able to make it any better myself. If you want to try, i attach > my patch. A tip to speed up work: use this script to generate a dvi > preview of glyphs (no need to run make, and it also shows metafont > control points): > #!/bin/bash > mf '\mode:=proof; input feta20' > gftodvi feta20.2602gf \ > && mv feta20.dvi feta20new.proof.dvi > > If you have trouble figuring out what to change, ask. > > W dniu 8 lipca 2011 00:14 użytkownik James Lowe > <james.l...@datacore.com> napisał: > > until you really print out a score and plop it on your music stand and then > > have sharps and flats and time signatures and other ornamentation, I don't > > really think one can make a definite case for either. > > True. Please send me some 2.15.5-compatible input files and i'll > compile them with my suggested clef, so we'll have some real-life > example to study. I'll also take something from my collection. > > thanks, > Janek > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- Dmytro O. Redchuk Bug Squad _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
