Hello, > > Message: 5 > Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 07:49:23 -0600 > From: Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu> > Subject: Re: Favorite Lilypond-Score Printer? > To: PMA <peterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu>, "lilypond-user@gnu.org" > <lilypond-user@gnu.org> > Message-ID: <c9b5ee03.1c0ff%c_soren...@byu.edu> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On 3/27/11 5:45 PM, "PMA" <peterarmstr...@aya.yale.edu> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi List. > > > > If you were shopping for a fine non-feature-crazy laser or inkjet > > printer to be used > > *only* for private publishing of your LilyPond scores (that trusty old > > dot-matrix will > > handle everything else), is there a make-&-model you would especially > > consider? > > > > One constraint -- it must output comfortably onto 11x17 inch card stock. > > > > As far as I'm concerned, it would be laser, not inkjet. > > For laser printers, it seems hard to go wrong with HP brand -- I've had a > lot of different laser printers, and HP seems to be the best. > > The HP 5000 series seems to be well-regarded, although I've never used one. > > The HP 5000N is a low-cost entry point. > > The HP 5100DTN costs more, but will handle duplexing (automatically print on > both sides of the paper). If you want double-sided printing, duplexing is > marvelous (I just bought a duplexing printer, and I love it). > > HTH, > > Carl > > >
FWIW, The HP 4700DN laser printer I have used jams every time I try to print double-sided. So effectively it cannot print double-sided. Otherwise, it's alright. I do agree though that laser is better than inkjet. Tim Reeves _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
