Am 07.02.2011, 14:03 Uhr, schrieb Phil Burfitt <phil.burf...@talktalk.net>:
----- Original Message -----
From: "-Eluze" <elu...@gmail.com>
To: <lilypond-user@gnu.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 2:57 PM
Subject: Re: Fingerings, Slurs and PhraseSlurs.
phil.burfitt wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to have fingerings and stroke fingerings placed outside
of
slurs, but inside of phrase slurs ?
one way is:
\relative c'' {
\override Slur #'outside-staff-priority = #100
\override Fingering #'outside-staff-priority = #200
\override PhrasingSlur #'outside-staff-priority = #300
c \(-1
d (-3
e -1 )
f -2 \)
}
hth
Hi Eluze,
Thank you, that fixed their order, but now the slur, fingering and
phrasingslur are distanced too far from the staff. Any ideas?
Phil.
hi Phil
i'm not aware of an automagic way of doing this
for the example above you could do something like:
\relative c'' {
\override Slur #'outside-staff-priority = #100
\override Fingering #'outside-staff-priority = #200
\override PhrasingSlur #'outside-staff-priority = #300
\override Slur #'extra-offset = #'(0 . -.5)
\override Fingering #'extra-offset = #'(0 . -1)
\override PhrasingSlur #'extra-offset = #'(0 . -2.5)
c \(-1
d (-3
e -1 )
f -2 \)
}
but then i'm afraid you'd have to check and adapt any occuring slurs,
phrasing slurs and fingerings manually!
somebody has a better idea? or why is Lilypond doing this?
Eluze
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
