On 2/2/11 11:10 AM, "Ronald Hochreiter" <ron...@subjectmusic.com> wrote:
> Dear Carl, Bart, David, > > don't know if my input is of any use, however - without fingering: > > Ddim xx0131 > Edim 0120x0 > > Starting from the Fdim it get's a bit more complicated in standard > tuning, see e.g. Fdim, where you'd have three possibilities: > > a) 1231xx or 1231x1 This is just Edim above up one fret, right? This could be useful for higher chords: f:dim 1231x1 fis:dim 2342x2 g:dim 3453x3 gis:dim 4564x4 a:dim 5675x5 bes:dim 6786x6 b:dim 7897x7 > b) xx6464 or 4x6464 This fingering for the Fdim seems to be a very versatile fingering that I'd expect to see used a lot. I know that I'd personaly like it, because it's relatively easy and consistent: cis:dim xx2020 d:dim xx3131 ees:dim xx4242 e:dim xx5353 f:dim xx6464 > c) x89A9x (A = 10) This one is also useful a:dim x0121x bes:dim x1232x b:dim x2343x c:dim x3454x cis:dim x4565x d:dim x5676x ees:dim x6787x e:dim x7898x f:dim x89a9x This gives lots of opportunities for the table below. I tend to favor diagrams with low fret numbers and muted strings at either the top or the bottom, rather than in the middle. Any recommendations? Thanks, Carl >> >> c:dim "x;3-4;1-1;o;1-2;o;" >> c:dim7 "x;x;1-1;2-3;1-2;2-4;" >> cis:dim "x;4-4;2-3;1-1;2-2;1-1;" >> cis:dim7 offset c:dim7 one fret >> d:dim >> d:dim7 "x;x;o;1-1;o;1-2;" >> dis:dim "2-2;o;1-1;2-3;x;2-4;" >> dis:dim7 "x;x;1-1;2-3;1-2;2-4;" >> e:dim >> e:dim7 offset dis:dim7 one fret >> f:dim >> f:dim7 "x;x;o;1-1;o;1-2;" >> fis:dim >> fis:dim7 same as dis:dim7 >> g:dim >> g:dim7 "x;x;5-2;6-4;5-3;3-1;" >> gis:dim >> gis:dim7 same as f:dim7 >> a:dim >> a:dim7 same as ees:dim7 >> ais:dim >> ais:dim7 offset ees:dim7 one fret >> b:dim >> b:dim7 same as d:dim7 >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Carl >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
