Hello,
Consider these two 'contrived' examples
--
\version "2.13.40"
\relative c'' {
c4 c8 c c4 bes | a2 a \bar "||"
\once \override Score.RehearsalMark #'break-visibility =
#begin-of-line-invisible
\once \override Score.RehearsalMark #'self-alignment-X = #RIGHT
\once \override Score.RehearsalMark #'direction = #DOWN
\mark \markup { \small \bold \italic "Fine."}
f4 f8 f f4 f | g2 g4 g |
}
\relative c'' {
c4 c8 c c4 bes | a2 a \bar "||"
\mark #1
f4 f8 f f4 f | g2 g4 g |
}
--
In the first {} example the 'fine.' is aligned with the bar line and in the
second the \mark is also aligned on the same bar line, I'd like to be able to
have a single system with the fine. 'text' \mark and a 'rehearsal mark' \mark
below and above respectively. I say this example is contrived because this
would be a nice *and simple* method (for me anyway) generally to align items
without having to worry about \tweaking each time I ever transpose or add more
bars/notes.
While I realise I could 'tweak' a markup and move it horizontally, the
align/break-visibility alignment method is a nice way of aligning to a given
bar without trial and error and using \mark 'rehearsal.mark' is very simple.
While we have an LSR example
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=10
This uses two staves. Using a << \\ >> construct with just explicit \marks
doesn't seem to work, and I wondered if this was possible?
I hope that makes sense.
James
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
