On 24/09/10 03:16, Kaz Kylheku wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 17:59:32 +0100, "Phil Burfitt" <phil.burf...@talktalk.net> wrote:Lilypond _prints_ really beautiful scores, but the pdf's quality on screen are poor compared to the other major notation software.Hard to believe. Please document your claim with some cropped screenshots.
Screen dump of some 2.13.34 output. PDF open at 200% in Adobe Reader 9.3.4 on Ubuntu 10.04. Check the barlines spanning the staffgroups. Four of the five barline terminations go past the top or bottom line of the stave. Also look at the stems of the two sixteenth notes at bottom right, which are markedly different in thickness.
Nick Hmm - would have helped if I'd attached the screenshot the first time...
<<attachment: example.png>>
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
