On Mon 20 Sep 2010, 10:08 David Kastrup wrote: > Anyway, if we have a sender knowing abbreviations, and a receiver _not_ > knowing them, they are not as much convenient for communication as for > establishing superiority. That was not about a (polite and convenient for all) way to answer emails in this list -- only about that abbreviations are convenient (if not, they would not appear in dictionaries at all).
I would say that abbreviations in this list appear far more often then "inconveniences" in communication; that's why i would think about how to make abbreviations clear. ps. "Inconveniences" are far more important, i agree; let's not to waste bytes "discussing" this .) pps. Anyway, _any_ criticism must be attempting to be be constructive; that's why i would think about how to make abbreviations clear. ppps. [O:= Nothing more. Not to flame =:O] -- Dmytro O. Redchuk Bug Squad Be careful! These are some commonly used abbreviations: • LM -- Learning Manual • NR -- Notation Reference • IR -- Internal Reference Look at LilyPond’s documentation to find more. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
