phil.burfitt wrote:
>
> Hi Eluze,
>
> Thanks, that gives a visible glissando, but unfortunately distances the
> grace note too much. If glissando minimum-length is set to anything less
> than 3, it disappears!
>
hi Phil!
i don't agree fully, but of course you have to judge from your final
context!
the following solution with a minimum-length = #2 looks quite acceptable to
me:
{
% \override Glissando #'gap = #5 % NO EFECT!?
\override Glissando #'minimum-length = #2.0
\override Glissando #'springs-and-rods = #ly:spanner::set-spacing-rods
\override Glissando #'bound-details #'left #'padding = #.6
\override Glissando #'bound-details #'right #'padding = #.9
\override Stem #'stroke-style = #"grace"
\grace a8 \glissando d4
}
> I would have thought grace notes with glissando instead of slur would have
> been an available user option, as they are quite common in guitar music.
>
the slur really makes sense and cannot simply be replaced by a straight line
- think of a grace/acciaccatura/appoggiatura with more than one note!
you should also have a look at (older) editions of pieces trying to show a
glissando from a grace to a normal note head… ( and not only that) -
sometimes you think there is a staccato dot somewhere, other times you think
there is a spot on the paper and further on
with lilypond you can do it - it is up to you to define what you prefer!
hope you'll find the good solution for your score!
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Acciaccatura-with-glissando-tp28901958p28908336.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
