Bernardo Barros wrote: > I wonder why not just work with Lilypond, or even modify Lilypond if > necessary to atend contemporary notation. It's easier to humans to > understad and it's already working ok :-) Maybe it has to do with the > render time????
The 'Sibelius Academy' mention is probably the clue there. I think the people involved were interested in developing a proprietary commercial project, which is kind of difficult with a Lilypond derivative. I think that one can probably do with Lilypond anything that this package does, it's just that some of it will require more custom scheme code than other stuff. I know that there have been some pretty spectacular things done by some clever members of this list (see the discussion some weeks back comparing Lilypond with SCORE). _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
