On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Francisco Vila <paconet....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello, Id' like to know whether I am the only who observes this:
>
> \version "2.13.18"
> { e' f' g' } \addlyrics { duer -- me~us ted }
>
> the slur looks okay on evince but not so in lilypondtool/jpedal or printer!
>
> http://paconet.org/lilypond/duermeusted.pngThe attached is what I see with xpdf. Note that a font glyph is used for the lyric slur, so maybe a strange font was chosen for this glyph on your system? In my Postscript output, I see 29.0547 -13.3453 moveto /FreeSerif 4.33691406 output-scale div selectfont 2.3559 0.0000 0.0000 /uni203F 1 print_glyphs which shows that, on my system, the serif font from GNU FreeFont is used. -Patrick
<<attachment: lyric_slur.png>>
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
